Devastating megafires are becoming more common, in part, because the planet is warming. But a new study led by SMU suggests bringing “good fire” back to the U.S. and other wildfire fire-prone areas, as Native Americans once did, could potentially blunt the role of climate in triggering today’s wildfires.
Wildfires are common particularly during the summer and fall months when conditions are dry and hot. Wildfires can be caused by a variety of factors, including lightning strikes, human activity, and prolonged drought. In recent years, climate change has also contributed to an increase in the frequency and severity of wildfires in the United States.
As the planet warms, certain areas become drier, which can create conditions that are more conducive to wildfire. In addition, rising temperatures can cause snow to melt earlier in the season, leading to longer wildfire seasons. Wildfires can also release large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere, which can further contribute to climate change. This creates a feedback loop in which climate change can exacerbate wildfires, and wildfires can contribute to climate change. Wildfires can have devastating effects on local communities, including loss of life, property damage, and air pollution.
The age-old Native American tradition of “cultural burning” appears to have previously weakened — though not entirely eliminated — the link between climate conditions and fire activity for roughly 400 years in the southwestern United States.
Studying a network of 4,824 fire-scarred trees in Arizona and New Mexico, where the Apache, Navajo and Jemez tribes lived, SMU fire anthropologist Christopher Roos and other researchers found that the typical climate-fire pattern from 1500 to 1900 reflected one to three years of above-average rainfall — allowing vegetation to grow — followed by a fire-fueling year of significant drought.
But the pattern was broken when Native American tribes performed traditional burning practices, according to the group’s study published in Science Advances.
Cultural burning, also known as prescribed burning, is a traditional land management practice used by many Native American tribes in the United States. This practice involves the controlled burning of vegetation in a way that helps to maintain the health and productivity of the land. Cultural burning is based on the belief that the land is a sacred trust that must be cared for and protected. By using fire to manage the land, Native American tribes can promote the growth of certain plants, improve habitat for wildlife, and reduce the risk of larger, more destructive wildfires. Cultural burning is an important part of many Native American traditions, and it continues to be used as a way to maintain the health and vitality of the land.
Cultural burning can help to mitigate the impacts of climate change in several ways. First, by reducing the amount of dry vegetation on the land, cultural burning can help to prevent the spread of large, damaging wildfires. This can help to protect communities and natural resources from the impacts of wildfire. In addition, cultural burning can help to promote the growth of certain plants that are well-suited to local climates and conditions. This can increase the resilience of the land to the effects of climate change, such as prolonged drought or extreme weather events.
“What’s remarkable is that this impact of Native American fire management was evident across hundreds of square kilometers,” said lead author Roos. “That is across entire mountain ranges.”
Roos said the findings suggest we can learn from Native Americans how to be less vulnerable to fires we’re facing now. Four of the co-authors of the study are tribal members, who aided with both the representation of the culture and history of their people and in the interpretation of the fire data.
“Native American or Indigenous fire practices have shown us how people living in fire-prone places can positively coexist with wildfire in sustainable ways by actively engaging with it,” he said.
For millennia, many Native American tribes living in the US Southwest held controlled burns of small trees, grasses and shrubs at regular intervals to clear out underbrush and encourage new plant growth.
Creating this patchwork of small, purposeful burns also removed much of the fuel that could burn in wildfires — which could explain the break in the climate-fire pattern, Roos said.
How this research was done
The Apache, Navajo and Jemez communities all practiced cultural burning, though at different times and in different ways.
The researchers used a variety of methods to document how these tribes handled smoke and fire centuries ago, including interviewing tribal members in each community. The team also compared tree-ring fire records with paleoclimate records.
Scientists rely on tree rings not only to calculate a tree’s age, but also to determine wet and dry weather patterns of moisture and drought. Similarly, scientists’ best evidence for fire activity is the scarring on tree rings that dates the occurrence of fires.
Roos and his team obtained their ancient tree-ring data from the International Multiproxy Paleofire Database, which was compiled by the North American Fire Network. The study focused on dry coniferous forests in New Mexico and Arizona.
The data was combined to create what’s known as a superposed epoch analysis. Essentially, the researchers were looking to find significant deviations from normal climate patterns before and during fire years. Deviations from the pattern would suggest that climate was not the main driver for fire activity.
“We found that during periods of intensive use [of controlled burns], most of the discrete stands of trees we looked at don’t have any significant fire-climate patterns,” Roos said. “So, in this case, the absence of significant climate patterns when Native Americans were managing fire is taken as strong evidence that Native American fire management itself is creating that lack of fire-climate patterns, since all other places and time periods show those significant climate associations.”
Roos encourages other scientists to work with Indigenous communities to develop new approaches to reconstruct traditional practices, like those seen in this study.
Cultural burning was vital to many indigenous tribes
Fire has been an integral part of the traditions and cultures of many Native American tribes, including the Apache, Navajo, and Jemez. These tribes have long used fire as a tool to manage the land and promote the growth of certain plants and wildlife. In all of these cases, fire was an important part of the tribes’ traditional way of life and was carefully managed to ensure its beneficial effects.
The Apache tribe spanned the area from central Arizona to Texas, but the researchers focused on the residents who lived in southeastern Arizona between the 1500s and 1900. The Apache people used fire to gather, garden and hunt primarily — sometimes setting fires to lure deer and elk to particular places.
On the northern border between Arizona and New Mexico, the Navajo people lived in small, family-based communities focused on raising sheep, hunting, gathering and gardening. Research shows that Navajo pastoralism reduced fire activity in pine forests, although burning practices may have also kept fires burning frequently in heavily-traveled areas.
The Jemez people were farmers and hunters who lived in the Jemez Mountains of northern New Mexico. They purposefully burned small patches of the forest around their community, previous research has found, limiting fire spread and improving forest resilience to climate variability.
In addition to Roos, team members include Nicholas Laluk, an anthropologist from the University of California, Berkeley and a member of the White Mountain Apache Tribe; Kerry Thompson, an anthropologist at Northern Arizona University and a member of the Navajo Nation: Chris Toya, a Tribal Historic Preservation Officer and a member of the Pueblo of Jemez; and Lionel Whitehair, a forest ecologist at Northern Arizona University and a member of the Navajo Nation.
The team also included scientists from the University of Colorado Boulder, NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Geological Survey, the University of Arizona, Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service.