Flowers are employing a materials science phenomenon typically associated with failures in structural engineering to produce exquisite three-dimensional petal patterns to lure pollinators.
In civil engineering “buckling” is a dirty word with the buckling of beams and columns leading to mechanical failure — and is something that engineers want to avoid.
But for some plants, buckling is being employed to advantage.
Flowers use several different strategies to lure pollinators. Chemical color from pigments is just one of these strategies and recent research is finding that iridescence could be just as important for attracting pollinators like bees.
This optical effect is produced by an intricate pattern of nanoscale ridges on the surface of petals that diffract light to cause iridescence, like that seen on the surface of CDs or soap bubbles, but how the plant develops these ridges was not known.
Research from the University of Cambridge has demonstrated that plants employ buckling to precisely alter the deformation of the surface of petals in hibiscus flowers. The findings are published in Cell Reports today.
“The petal striations on hibiscus flowers develop during petal growth, and Professor Beverley Glover’s team, who were the first to discover the iridescence properties in flowers, suspected that they may be caused by mechanical properties as the petals expanded,” said Dr. Sarah Robinson in the University of Cambridge’s Sainsbury Laboratory and lead of the research.
Working with members of Professor Glover’s team, Dr. Robinson was able to test this model by using a robotic system, called ACME (automated confocal micro-extensometer) that she had earlier developed to measure mechanical properties in plants. They applied a specific force to stretch immature hibiscus (Hibiscus trionum) petals that had not yet developed striations to see if it was possible to mechanically induce the patterns. “The ACME developed by Dr. Sarah Robinson gave us the unique chance to investigate if Hibiscus striation patterns could be mechanically induced,” said Dr. Chiara Airoldi, in the University of Cambridge’s Department of Plant Sciences and first author.
“We saw striations appear almost instantaneously when mechanical stress was applied. This told us that it was buckling that was causing wrinkling of the petal surface and not a slower biological process. We were able to measure the striations and show that they had the same properties as they do when they develop naturally. One of the big surprises was that we could also induce striations at 90 degrees to the striations that naturally occur, which indicates that the orientation of the striations is not pre-patterned. However, we could not induce striations in other parts of the petals, suggesting that the ability to form striations is under genetic control,” said Dr. Robinson.
The buckling occurs in the cuticle, which is a waxy surface covering made up of two layers. It is these two layers with different mechanical properties that make the buckling possible.
“Using buckling theory we postulated a model and recreated the experiment. This allowed us to illustrate why some cuticles wrinkle and others do not, emphasizing the role of layers,” said Dr. Carlos Lugo, in the University of Cambridge’s Department of Plant Sciences.
“Using cryo-SEM (scanning electron microscopy) fractures we have been able to show that the cuticle that striates has two physically distinct layers. We are further investigating the development of hibiscus petal striations through a combined approach of mathematical modeling and measurements of physical properties of the layers,” said Dr. Airoldi.
An estimated 35 percent of the world’s crop harvest relies on animal pollinators and with pollinator populations in decline, understanding how the relationships and signaling operate between plants and pollinators is of growing importance.
Source: Chiara A. Airoldi, Carlos A. Lugo, Raymond Wightman, Beverley J. Glover, Sarah Robinson. Mechanical buckling can pattern the light-diffracting cuticle of Hibiscus trionum. Cell Reports, 2021; 36 (11): 109715 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109715
Cite This Page: